asp.net-mvc-3 – 为什么在使用Azure缓存(.NET MVC3应用程序)时无法组合[Authorize]和[OutputCache]属性？

使用Windows Azure的Microsoft.Web.distributedCache.distributedCacheOutputCacheProvider作为MVC3应用程序的outputCache提供程序。以下是相关的操作方法：

[ActionName("sample-cached-page")]
[OutputCache(Duration = 300,varyByCustom = "User",Location = OutputCacheLocation.Server)]
[Authorize(Users = "[e-mail],[e-mail]")]
public virtual ActionResult SampleCachedPage()
{
    return View();
}

从Web浏览器加载此视图时，我会收到以下异常：

System.Configuration.Provider.ProviderException: When using a custom output cache provider like 'distributedCache',only the following expiration policies and cache features are supported: file dependencies,absolute expirations,static validation callbacks and static substitution callbacks.

System.Configuration.Provider.ProviderException: When using a custom output cache provider like 'distributedCache',only the following expiration policies and cache features are supported:  file dependencies,static validation callbacks and static substitution callbacks.
   at System.Web.Caching.OutputCache.InsertResponse(String cachedvaryKey,Cachedvary cachedvary,String rawResponseKey,CachedRawResponse rawResponse,CacheDependency dependencies,DateTime absExp,TimeSpan slidingExp)
   at System.Web.Caching.OutputCacheModule.OnLeave(Object source,EventArgs eventArgs)
   at System.Web.HttpApplication.SyncEventExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep.Execute()
   at System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(IExecutionStep step,Boolean& completedSynchronously)

如果我删除[Authorize]属性，视图将按预期缓存。这是否意味着我不能将[OutputCache]放在必须具有[授权]的操作方法上？或者，是否需要使用为缓存使用静态验证回调方法的自定义实现来覆盖AuthorizeAttribute？

更新1

在Evan的答案之后，我在IIS Express(Azure外)测试了上述动作方法。以下是对OutputCache属性的varyByCustom =“User”属性的覆盖：

public override string GetvaryByCustomString(HttpContext context,string custom)
{
    return "User".Equals(custom,StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase)
        ? Thread.CurrentPrincipal.Identity.Name
        : base.GetvaryByCustomString(context,custom);
}

当我访问示例缓存页面为[e-mail]时，该页面的输出被缓存，视图显示“此页被缓存在12/31/2011 11:06:12 AM(UTC)”。如果我以[e-mail]身份登录并登录，请访问该页面，显示“此页面缓存于12/31/2011 11:06:38 AM(UTC)”。重新登录为[e-mail]并重新访问页面将导致缓存显示“此页面被缓存在12/31/2011 11:06:12 AM(UTC)”。进一步登录/尝试显示不同的输出正在被缓存根据用户返回。

这导致我相信输出是基于用户单独缓存的，这是我的varyByCustom =“用户”设置&覆盖。问题是它不适用于Azure的分布式缓存提供程序。埃文，你是否回答只有缓存公开的内容呢还是站立的？

更新2

我挖出了源代码，发现开箱即用的AuthorizeAttribute实际上有一个非静态的验证回调函数。以下是OnAuthorization的摘录：

if (AuthorizeCore(filterContext.HttpContext)) {
    // ** IMPORTANT **
    // Since we're performing authorization at the action level,the authorization code runs
    // after the output caching module. In the worst case this Could allow an authorized user
    // to cause the page to be cached,then an unauthorized user would later be served the
    // cached page. We work around this by telling proxies not to cache the sensitive page,// then we hook our custom authorization code into the caching mechanism so that we have
    // the final say on whether a page should be served from the cache.

    HttpCachePolicyBase cachePolicy = filterContext.HttpContext.Response.Cache;
    cachePolicy.SetProxyMaxAge(new TimeSpan(0));
    cachePolicy.AddValidationCallback(CacheValidateHandler,null /* data */);
}
else {
    HandleUnauthorizedRequest(filterContext);
}

CacheValidationHandler将缓存验证委托给受保护的虚拟HttpValidationStatus OnCacheAuthorization(HttpContextBase)，这当然不是静态的。它不是静态的一个原因是因为，如上面的重要注释中所述，它调用受保护的虚拟bool AuthorizeCore(HttpContextBase)。

为了从静态缓存验证回调方法中执行任何AuthorizeCore逻辑，它需要知道AuthorizeAttribute实例的Users和Roles属性。但是，似乎并没有一个简单的方法来插入。我必须重写OnAuthorization以将这两个值放入HttpContext(Items集合？)中，然后覆盖OnCacheAuthorization以使它们退出。但是闻起来很脏

如果我们小心地使用OutputCache属性中的varyByCustom =“User”属性，那么我们只能覆盖OnCacheAuthorization来始终返回HttpValidationStatus.Valid？当action方法没有OutputCache属性时，我们不需要担心这个回调被调用是正确的吗？如果我们有一个没有varyByCustom =“User”的OutputCache属性，那么显而易见的是，页面可以返回任何缓存的版本，而不管用户的请求是创建缓存的副本。这有多风险？

解决方法

缓存发生在Action之前。您可能需要自定义您的授权机制来处理缓存方案。

查看我发布的一个问题 – MVC Custom Authentication,Authorization,and Roles Implementation。

我认为这将帮助您的一部分是OnAuthorize()方法处理缓存的自定义授权属性。

以下是一个代码块，例如：

/// <summary>
/// Uses injected authorization service to determine if the session user 
/// has necessary role privileges.
/// </summary>
/// <remarks>As authorization code runs at the action level,after the 
/// caching module,our authorization code is hooked into the caching 
/// mechanics,to ensure unauthorized users are not served up a 
/// prior-authorized page. 
/// Note: Special thanks to TheCloudlessSky on StackOverflow.
/// </remarks>
public void OnAuthorization(AuthorizationContext filterContext)
{
    // User must be authenticated and Session not be null
    if (!filterContext.HttpContext.User.Identity.IsAuthenticated || filterContext.HttpContext.Session == null)
        HandleUnauthorizedRequest(filterContext);
    else {
        // if authorized,handle cache validation
        if (_authorizationService.IsAuthorized((UserSessionInfoviewmodel)filterContext.HttpContext.Session["user"],_authorizedRoles)) {
            var cache = filterContext.HttpContext.Response.Cache;
            cache.SetProxyMaxAge(new TimeSpan(0));
            cache.AddValidationCallback((HttpContext context,object o,ref HttpValidationStatus status) => AuthorizeCache(context),null);
        }
        else
            HandleUnauthorizedRequest(filterContext);             
    }
}

/// <summary>
/// Ensures that authorization is checked on cached pages.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="httpContext"></param>
/// <returns></returns>
public HttpValidationStatus AuthorizeCache(HttpContext httpContext)
{
    if (httpContext.Session == null)
        return HttpValidationStatus.Invalid;
    return _authorizationService.IsAuthorized((UserSessionInfoviewmodel) httpContext.Session["user"],_authorizedRoles) 
        ? HttpValidationStatus.Valid 
        : HttpValidationStatus.IgnoreThisRequest;
}

原文地址：https://www.jb51.cc/aspnet/252204.html