带有迭代器的多处理池

如何解决带有迭代器的多处理池

如果我不得不猜测代码的主要问题，那是因为将您的代码传递input_rows给了流程函数insert()-multiprocessing.Pool.apply_async()工作方式是解压缩传递给它的参数，因此您的insert()函数实际上是获取100参数，而不是列出一个参数的100元素。这会在过程功能甚至没有机会启动之前立即导致错误。如果更改pool.apply_async(insert, [input_rows])对它的调用，它可能会开始起作用…您也将违反迭代器的目的，您可能会将整个输入迭代器转换为一个列表，并馈给100to的切片multiprocessing.Pool.map()并使用它完成。

但是您问是否有一种“更好”的方法。尽管“更好”是一个相对类别，但在理想情况下，multiprocessing.Pool它提供了一种方便的imap()（和imap_unordered()）方法来使用可迭代对象，并以懒惰的方式将其散布到选定的池中（因此在处理之前不会在整个迭代器上运行），因此您需要构建的只是迭代器切片，并将其传递给它进行处理，即：

import arcpy
import itertools
import multiprocessing

# a utility function to get us a slice of an iterator, as an iterator
# when working with iterators maximum lazyness is preferred 
def iterator_slice(iterator, length):
    iterator = iter(iterator)
    while True:
        res = tuple(itertools.islice(iterator, length))
        if not res:
            break
        yield res

def insert(rows):
    with arcpy.da.InsertCursor("c:\temp2.gdb\test" fields=["*"]) as i_cursor:
        for row in rows:
            i_cursor.insertRow(row)

if __name__ == "__main__":  # guard for multi-platform use
    with arcpy.da.SearchCursor("c:\temp.gdb\test", fields=["*"]) as s_cursor:
        pool = multiprocessing.Pool(processes=4)  # lets use 4 workers
        for result in pool.imap_unordered(insert, iterator_slice(s_cursor, 100)):
            pass  # do whatever you want with your result (return from your process function)
        pool.close()  # all done, close cleanly

（顺便说一句，对于所有s_cursor不是100的倍数的尺寸，您的代码都不会给出最后一个切片）

但是…如果它确实如广告所宣传的那样，那就太好了。尽管多年来已经修复了很多问题，但在生成自己的迭代器时imap_unordered()仍会抽取 的迭代器 （远远大于实际池进程的数量），因此，如果您对此感到担忧，则必须放弃并且弄脏自己，并且您处在正确的轨道上—这apply_async()是您想要控制如何喂食池的方法，您只需要确保正确喂食 池即可：

if __name__ == "__main__":
    with arcpy.da.SearchCursor("c:\temp.gdb\test", fields=["*"]) as s_cursor:
        pool = multiprocessing.Pool(processes=4)  # lets use 4 workers
        cursor_iterator = iterator_slice(s_cursor, 100)  # slicer from above, for convinience
        queue = []  # a queue for our current worker async results, a deque would be faster
        while cursor_iterator or queue:  # while we have anything to do...
            try:
                # add our next slice to the pool:
                queue.append(pool.apply_async(insert, [next(cursor_iterator)])) 
            except (stopiteration, TypeError):  # no more data, clear out the slice iterator
                cursor_iterator = None
            # wait for a free worker or until all remaining finish
            while queue and (len(queue) >= pool._processes or not cursor_iterator):
                process = queue.pop(0)  # grab a process response from the top
                process.wait(0.1)  # let it breathe a little, 100ms should be enough
                if not process.ready():  # a sub-process has not finished execution
                    queue.append(process)  # add it back to the queue
                else:
                    # you can use process.get() to get the result if needed
                    pass
        pool.close()

现在，s_cursor仅当需要下一个100个结果时（无论insert()流程函数是否干净退出），才调用迭代器。

-如果需要捕获的结果，则先前发布的代码最后在关闭队列中存在一个错误，此代码应能很好地完成工作。我们可以使用一些模拟功能轻松地对其进行测试：

import random
import time

# just an example generator to prove lazy access by printing when it generates
def get_counter(limit=100):
    for i in range(limit):
        if not i % 3:  # print every third generation to reduce verbosity
            print("Generated: {}".format(i))
        yield i

# our process function, just prints what's passed to it and waits for 1-6 seconds
def test_process(values):
    time_to_wait = 1 + random.random() * 5
    print("Processing: {}, waiting: {:0.2f} seconds".format(values, time_to_wait))
    time.sleep(time_to_wait)
    print("Processed: {}".format(values))

现在我们可以像这样缠绕它们：

if __name__ == "__main__":
    pool = multiprocessing.Pool(processes=2)  # lets use just 2 workers
    count = get_counter(30)  # get our counter iterator set to iterate from 0-29
    count_iterator = iterator_slice(count, 7)  # we'll process them in chunks of 7
    queue = []  # a queue for our current worker async results, a deque would be faster
    while count_iterator or queue:
        try:
            # add our next slice to the pool:
            queue.append(pool.apply_async(test_process, [next(count_iterator)]))
        except (stopiteration, TypeError):  # no more data, clear out the slice iterator
            count_iterator = None
        # wait for a free worker or until all remaining workers finish
        while queue and (len(queue) >= pool._processes or not count_iterator):
            process = queue.pop(0)  # grab a process response from the top
            process.wait(0.1)  # let it breathe a little, 100ms should be enough
            if not process.ready():  # a sub-process has not finished execution
                queue.append(process)  # add it back to the queue
            else:
                # you can use process.get() to get the result if needed
                pass
    pool.close()

结果是（当然，系统之间会有所不同）：

Generated: 0
Generated: 3
Generated: 6
Generated: 9
Generated: 12
Processing: (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6), waiting: 3.32 seconds
Processing: (7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13), waiting: 2.37 seconds
Processed: (7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13)
Generated: 15
Generated: 18
Processing: (14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20), waiting: 1.85 seconds
Processed: (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6)
Generated: 21
Generated: 24
Generated: 27
Processing: (21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27), waiting: 2.55 seconds
Processed: (14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20)
Processing: (28, 29), waiting: 3.14 seconds
Processed: (21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27)
Processed: (28, 29)

证明我们的生成器/迭代器仅在池中有可用插槽进行工作时才可收集数据，以确保最小的内存使用（和/或如果迭代器最终做到了这一点，则I / O繁重）。您不会比这更简化。您可以获得的唯一的（尽管是微不足道的）加速是减少等待时间（但是您的主进程将消耗更多的资源）并增加允许的queue大小（以内存为代价），该大小被锁定到进程数在上面的代码中- 如果使用while queue and (len(queue) >= pool._processes + 3 or not count_iterator):它，它将加载3个以上的迭代器片，以确保在进程结束且池中的插槽释放时的延迟减少。

解决方法

我想将多处理池与迭代器一起使用，以便在将迭代器拆分为N个元素的线程中执行函数，直到迭代器完成为止。

import arcpy
from multiprocessing import Pool

def insert(rows):
    with arcpy.da.InsertCursor("c:\temp2.gdb\test" fields=["*"]) as i_cursor:
        #i_cursor is an iterator
        for row in rows:
            i_cursor.insertRow(row)

input_rows = []
count = 0
pool = Pool(4)
with arcpy.da.SearchCursor("c:\temp.gdb\test",fields=["*"]) as s_cursor:
    #s_cursor is an iterator
    for row in s_cursor:
        if (count < 100):
            input_rows.append(row)
            count += 1
        else:
            #send 100 rows to the insert function in a new thread
            pool.apply_async(insert,input_rows)
            #reset count and input_rows
            count = 1
            input_rows = [row]


pool.join()
pool.close()

我的问题是，此脚本是正确的方法吗？有没有更好的办法？

该脚本可能出了点问题，因为我在 pool.join()

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "G:\Maxime\truncate_append_pool.py",line 50,in <module>
    pool.join()
  File "C:\App\Python27\ArcGIS10.3\lib\multiprocessing\pool.py",line 460,in join
    assert self._state in (CLOSE,TERMINATE)
AssertionError